AI video of dead road rage victim used in court to deliver message to killer

A road rage killer had his manslaughter sentence tossed after an AI-generated video message of the dead victim was played in court

Gabriel Horcasitas, 55, was ordered on Wednesday to be resentenced by the Arizona Court of Appeals.

Horcasitas was sentenced to 10 and a half years in prison for the 2021 shooting and killing of Chris Pelkey, 37, at a red light in Chandler.

During the sentencing, a computer-generated video of Chris saying he ‘forgives’ his killer was played as a victim impact statement.

This video made the judge ‘so prejudicial as to render the sentencing procedure fundamentally unfair’, the appellate court ruling said.

‘We vacate the manslaughter sentence and remand for resentencing because the AI video was not reliable,’ it added.

Family wanted to bring victim ‘back to life’ using AI

CHANDLER, AZ ? Christopher Pelkey was killed in a road rage incident in Chandler in 2021, but last month, artificial intelligence brought him back to life during his killer?s sentencing hearing. It was the first time in Arizona judicial history ? and possibly nationwide ? that AI has been used to create a deceased victim?s own impact statement. Screenshot 2025-05-05 at 10.00.10?AM.png Provided to KNXV Screenshot from AI victim impact statement 00:05 02:00 Read More Pelkey?s sister and brother-in-law used the technology to recreate his image and voice likeness to ?talk? to the courtroom about his life and the day he met Gabriel Paul Horcasitas, who shot him during a confrontation near Gilbert and Germann roads. ?In another life, we probably could have been friends,? the AI creation of the 37-year-old Army veteran said, addressing Horcasitas. ?I believe in forgiveness?? The AI video also included real video clips from videos taken while he was alive, along with some of his personality and humor, while showing a real photo he once took with an "old age" filter. "This is the best I can ever give you of what I would have looked like if I got the chance to grow old," the AI version of Pelkey said. "Remember, getting old is a gift that not everybody has, so embrace it and stop worrying about those wrinkles." Stacey Wales, Pelkey's sister, said everyone who knew Pelkey "agreed this capture was a true representation of the spirit and soul of how Chris would have thought about his own sentencing as a murder victim." The state asked for a 9.5-year sentence, and the judge ended up giving Horcasitas 10.5 years for manslaughter, after being so moved by the powerful video, family says. The judge even referred to the video in his closing sentencing statements. Pelkey?s family sought justice and found some peace in the process, especially seeing how one of Stacey?s children reacted to seeing their Uncle Chris one more time. ?'Mom and Dad, thank you so much for making that. I needed to hear from Uncle Chris one last time. And that meant so much, thank you.' That is not what this is intended to do. The result of it having it be a healing piece for anybody who saw it was just a beneficial result,? said Stacey. Chief Justice Timmer offered the following response about the use of AI: AI has the potential to create great efficiencies in the justice system and may assist those unschooled in the law to better present their positions. For that reason, we are excited about AI?s potential. But AI can also hinder or even upend justice if inappropriately used. A measured approach is best. Along those lines, the court has formed an AI committee to examine AI use and make recommendations for how best to use it. At bottom, those who use AI?including courts?are responsible for its accuracy.
CHANDLER, AZ ? Christopher Pelkey was killed in a road rage incident in Chandler in 2021, but last month, artificial intelligence brought him back to life during his killer?s sentencing hearing. It was the first time in Arizona judicial history ? and possibly nationwide ? that AI has been used to create a deceased victim?s own impact statement. Screenshot 2025-05-05 at 10.00.10?AM.png Provided to KNXV Screenshot from AI victim impact statement 00:05 02:00 Read More Pelkey?s sister and brother-in-law used the technology to recreate his image and voice likeness to ?talk? to the courtroom about his life and the day he met Gabriel Paul Horcasitas, who shot him during a confrontation near Gilbert and Germann roads. ?In another life, we probably could have been friends,? the AI creation of the 37-year-old Army veteran said, addressing Horcasitas. ?I believe in forgiveness?? The AI video also included real video clips from videos taken while he was alive, along with some of his personality and humor, while showing a real photo he once took with an "old age" filter. "This is the best I can ever give you of what I would have looked like if I got the chance to grow old," the AI version of Pelkey said. "Remember, getting old is a gift that not everybody has, so embrace it and stop worrying about those wrinkles." Stacey Wales, Pelkey's sister, said everyone who knew Pelkey "agreed this capture was a true representation of the spirit and soul of how Chris would have thought about his own sentencing as a murder victim." The state asked for a 9.5-year sentence, and the judge ended up giving Horcasitas 10.5 years for manslaughter, after being so moved by the powerful video, family says. The judge even referred to the video in his closing sentencing statements. Pelkey?s family sought justice and found some peace in the process, especially seeing how one of Stacey?s children reacted to seeing their Uncle Chris one more time. ?'Mom and Dad, thank you so much for making that. I needed to hear from Uncle Chris one last time. And that meant so much, thank you.' That is not what this is intended to do. The result of it having it be a healing piece for anybody who saw it was just a beneficial result,? said Stacey. Chief Justice Timmer offered the following response about the use of AI: AI has the potential to create great efficiencies in the justice system and may assist those unschooled in the law to better present their positions. For that reason, we are excited about AI?s potential. But AI can also hinder or even upend justice if inappropriately used. A measured approach is best. Along those lines, the court has formed an AI committee to examine AI use and make recommendations for how best to use it. At bottom, those who use AI?including courts?are responsible for its accuracy.

Chris’ family decided to ‘bring him back to life’ by using AI to read out a statement, sister Stacey Wales told News 4 San Antonio.

She fed the tech photographs of Chris and used an ‘age filter’ to make him appear in his 40s, which he would have been at the time if alive.

Stacey also uploaded video and audio of Chris talking so the programme could clone his voice.

‘All I kept coming back to, what would Chris say?’ she said. ‘It became so real I broke down in tears.’

Stacey scripted her synthetic sibling to tell the judge: ‘It’s a shame we encountered each other that day under those circumstances; in another life we could have been friends.

‘I believe in forgiveness and God who forgives. I always have and still do.’

FILE - Stacey Wales, sister of the late Christopher Pelkey, displays her brother's image at her mother's home, May 7, 2025, in Chandler, Ariz. (AP Photo/Matt York, File)

The video showed a fake Chris wearing a baseball cap and an olive green zip-up hoodie, his mouth not quite syncing with the audio.

After the video played, Judge Todd Lang said he ‘loved the AI’ and felt it was ‘genuine’.

The forged video showed the ‘obvious forgiveness’ of Horcastitas, which Lang said came from the victim’s ‘heart’.

Victim impact statements are read to courts during the sentencing hearing so judges can consider the full extent of harm caused by the crime.

Stacey’s lawyer, Jessica Gattuso, initially doubted whether a statement read by a deepfake is ‘even legal’.

‘Our law in Arizona says victims can give their victim impact statement, they have the discretion to choose how they give their victim impact statement,’ Gattuso said.

FILE - The Army dress uniform and photo of the late Christopher Pelkey is displayed at his mother's home, May 7, 2025, in Chandler, Ariz. (AP Photo/Matt York, File)

The Court of Appeals had similar concerns, writing that the state has never addressed the admissibility of AI-generated victim personas.

Instead, appellate judges looked to the Arizona Supreme Court’s analysis in State v Rose.

Edward James Rose, sentenced to death for the 2007 killing of a Phoenix police officer, said that photos of the officer’s sons at his grave were too prejudicial to be considered victim impact evidence.

But the top court said that while the images came ‘close’ to ‘crossing the line’, with or without them, the sentencing would have been the same.

‘By contrast, the AI video crossed that line,’ the appellate judges wrote of Chris.

‘Unlike the photographs in Rose, which captured a particularly poignant moment for the young surviving victims, the AI video here (excluding the embedded “real” videos of the victim) does not reflect actual events.

CHANDLER, AZ ? Christopher Pelkey was killed in a road rage incident in Chandler in 2021, but last month, artificial intelligence brought him back to life during his killer?s sentencing hearing. It was the first time in Arizona judicial history ? and possibly nationwide ? that AI has been used to create a deceased victim?s own impact statement. Screenshot 2025-05-05 at 10.00.10?AM.png Provided to KNXV Screenshot from AI victim impact statement 00:05 02:00 Read More Pelkey?s sister and brother-in-law used the technology to recreate his image and voice likeness to ?talk? to the courtroom about his life and the day he met Gabriel Paul Horcasitas, who shot him during a confrontation near Gilbert and Germann roads. ?In another life, we probably could have been friends,? the AI creation of the 37-year-old Army veteran said, addressing Horcasitas. ?I believe in forgiveness?? The AI video also included real video clips from videos taken while he was alive, along with some of his personality and humor, while showing a real photo he once took with an "old age" filter. "This is the best I can ever give you of what I would have looked like if I got the chance to grow old," the AI version of Pelkey said. "Remember, getting old is a gift that not everybody has, so embrace it and stop worrying about those wrinkles." Stacey Wales, Pelkey's sister, said everyone who knew Pelkey "agreed this capture was a true representation of the spirit and soul of how Chris would have thought about his own sentencing as a murder victim." The state asked for a 9.5-year sentence, and the judge ended up giving Horcasitas 10.5 years for manslaughter, after being so moved by the powerful video, family says. The judge even referred to the video in his closing sentencing statements. Pelkey?s family sought justice and found some peace in the process, especially seeing how one of Stacey?s children reacted to seeing their Uncle Chris one more time. ?'Mom and Dad, thank you so much for making that. I needed to hear from Uncle Chris one last time. And that meant so much, thank you.' That is not what this is intended to do. The result of it having it be a healing piece for anybody who saw it was just a beneficial result,? said Stacey. Chief Justice Timmer offered the following response about the use of AI: AI has the potential to create great efficiencies in the justice system and may assist those unschooled in the law to better present their positions. For that reason, we are excited about AI?s potential. But AI can also hinder or even upend justice if inappropriately used. A measured approach is best. Along those lines, the court has formed an AI committee to examine AI use and make recommendations for how best to use it. At bottom, those who use AI?including courts?are responsible for its accuracy.

‘Indeed, rather than documenting an event or recording a particular moment, the AI video presents a depiction of the victim and his thoughts created from the imaginings of the victim’s sister.’

The appellate judge took issue with how the video was screened, as if the victim themselves said it from beyond the grave.

The AI Chris said: ‘This here is a true representation of who I was, you know, not how the courtroom portrayed me.’

Stacey previously told Arizona’s Family that she wrote ‘what [Chris] would have said’ in the victim impact statement script.

‘I said, “That’s pretty good, I’d like to hear that if I was the judge”,’ she told the broadcaster.

She added that she scripted this even though she was not ready to forgive Horcasitas.

‘He stood for people and for God and for love,’ Stacey said.

Horcasitas’ resentencing date has yet to be decided.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, .

MORE: US diplomat whisked from UK over paedophilia claims ‘swapped 75 child abuse pics with brother’

MORE: Woman told her partner she had sold their two children when she had never given birth

MORE: Trump says he feels ‘bad’ for Cornell 7 and calls investigator by ‘racist’ nickname

Original source AI video of dead road rage victim used in court to deliver message to killer

Back to home