Andy Burnham apologises over PMQs comments about Ann Widdecombe case

File photo dated 23/05/24 of Ann Widdecombe speaking during a Reform UK General Election campaign launch in Westminster, London. Joshua Kerry, from Rotherham, South Yorkshire, is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Tuesday charged with the murder of former MP Ann Widdecombe. Issue date: Monday July 20, 2026. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Lucy North/PA Wire

Andy Burnham has apologised after he appeared to breach the presumption of innocence in the court case dealing with Ann Widdecombe’s murder.

Responding to Reform leader Nigel Farage at yesterday’s Prime Minister’s Questions, the PM referred to an ‘individual’ who was ‘responsible for the murder’ of the ex-Tory MP in July.

However, the legal process remains in its early stages and no plea has yet been entered.

Joshua Kerry, 28, was arrested on suspicion of murder on July 11 and a trial before a High Court judge is scheduled for June 8 next year.

Last week, Kerry appeared in court again, facing a new allegation of preparing terrorist acts including against Farage.

After his comment at PMQs, the Conservatives said Burnham had ‘publicly spoken as though a man awaiting trial has already been convicted of murder.’

Make sense of the mad world of British politics

Want to understand how what goes on in Westminster actually affects your life? Get analysis of what the biggest stories mean straight to your inbox every week. Sign up here.

Tory shadow Commons leader Jesse Norman said: ‘It’s directly contrary to the rule of law, it is a breach of the presumption of innocence, it is misleading to the House.

‘And in any other forum it would be a contempt of court, which could be used to suggest the defendant had been prejudged on the merits of a case.’

Britain's Prime Minister Andy Burnham speaks during Prime Minister's Questions at the House of Commons in London, Britain, October 14, 2026. ?? House of Commons/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. MANDATORY CREDIT. IMAGE MUST NOT BE ALTERED.

Words spoken by MPs within the House of Commons chamber are protected by parliamentary privilege.

This means they have immunity from being found in contempt of court for anything said during proceedings in the House – a privilege that dates back to the 17th century.

However, the self-imposed sub judice rule prevents MPs from referring to matters awaiting adjudication in a court of law within debates, questions and motions.

Court artist sketch by Elizabeth Cook of Joshua Kerry, 28, appearing at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London where is accused of one count of preparation of terrorist acts relating to alleged activity between May 31 2024 and July 8 2026. The man accused of murdering Ann Widdecombe allegedly carried out research into a number of prominent people and individuals before a terror plot at Nigel Farage's home. Picture date: Wednesday October 7, 2026. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Elizabeth Cook/PA Wire

Today, House of Commons leader Sir Alan Campbell said: ‘The Prime Minister has acknowledged that he misspoke…

‘He said that he misspoke, he has apologised, and he has corrected the record.

‘There isn’t an excuse for misspeaking in the House, and I’m not trying to explain that away, but this Prime Minister is characterised by an authenticity and a passion in the way that he responds.

‘It’s not unusual either for prime ministers or for anybody else to speak in the House, as long as you correct the record, which he has done, then I think that should be put into perspective.’

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, .

MORE: Labour asks its councils to scrap coalitions with the Greens over Zionism policy

MORE: Secret video shows Reform figures calling King ‘Muslim’ and black kids ‘animals’

MORE: Nigel Farage says he would make shock Chagos deal with ‘close friend’ Donald Trump

Original source Andy Burnham apologises over PMQs comments about Ann Widdecombe case

Back to home