
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today.
Join todayAlready a member? Log in
The government is facing a legal challenge from the Oxfordshire village of Piddington over its decision to turn a nearby Ministry of Defence site into accommodation for more than 1,200 detained asylum seekers.
Backlash from local residents, who have reacted with anger to the government proposals, is continuing to mount as ministers seek to close asylum hotels.
Angela Rayner, the communities secretary, has granted full planning permission for the site, but Piddington parish council chair, Tim McNally, says villagers will fight the decision in the courts.
Their opposition has even included a symbolic referendum to declare Piddington independent from the rest of the country.
There is now a six-week window in which the decision can be challenged legally.
Mr McNally said there would be “many actions” by villagers, and that ministers should “absolutely” be braced for a legal challenge.
He told BBC Radio 4's programme that the village could also apply the new Hillsborough Law, which would create a legally enforceable duty of candour which compels public officials and authorities to act transparently when investigations and inquiries take place.
Mr McNally told the programme: "Last night, (Prime Minister) Andy Burnham was on a podium talking about the violence, sexual violence towards women, and bringing it upon the media industry as their responsibility to manage.
“But the reality is, is that this is exactly what the government is doing to us here.”
Asked how the village would respond, he said: "There's going to be many actions, you will see. We will disclose that as we move forward.
“Today is a day of reflection, and we’ll work out where we plan to go from this point. But I will say, the Hillsborough Law is there for a reason, and we’re going to apply it.”
Asked if ministers should be braced for a legal challenge, he said: “Absolutely, absolutely.”
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the plans were a “betrayal of the women of Piddington” and “emblematic of Labour and Angela Rayner’s disregard for the law and women and girls’ safety”.
She said on social media: "When I visited Piddington I met a village terrified of what was about to land on their doorstep.
"The Government said it was listening, instead it's completely ignored this community's concerns.
The 1,000-plus male migrants that Labour are about to deposit in Oxfordshire are in Britain illegally. They should be deported as soon as possible, not housed in areas completely unsuitable for the task."
Liberal Democrats education spokesperson Munira Wilson also spoke out against the decision, arguing asylum seekers should “stay where they are at the moment”.
“Angela Rayner's decision beggars belief given the warnings that have been given to her over the strain on local NHS services, on community cohesion and the fact that the site has got asbestos and other major challenges with it,” she told Times Radio
“It just makes no sense financially, environmentally and in terms of community cohesion and services."
Reform UK’s home affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf accused the government of having “betrayed their own people”.
"Over 1200 unvetted illegal migrant men are being dumped in Piddington. They will outnumber the women of Piddington by eight to one,” he said.
"Tory and Labour governments have betrayed their own people. Reform will detain and deport all of these men."
Downing Street said it “completely understands the strength feeling” on this issue in Piddington, but insisted “the safety of the public will always be our top priority”.
Defence Minister Luke Pollard said that the government would continue to engage with the community.
He told LBC: "It's pretty obvious that there's a strong sense of feeling from the community around Bicester, especially in Piddington.
"The Home Office continues to engage with those.
"There's still a few more stages to go here, so it's not yet fully locked in and delivered, so that we can understand where the concerns are, so they can be mitigated.
“I recognise that any change for the people around MoD Bicester will be a concern, and that’s why it’s so important that the Home Office engages with the community.”
A Home Office spokesperson said on Thursday: "Planning permission allows us to continue to progress the use of MoD Bicester. However, a final decision to proceed is yet to be taken.
"The government is working on a fairer distribution of asylum accommodation across the country, with over £1 billion saved in costs since the election.
"This includes closing all asylum hotels and moving to alternative accommodation, including former military sites.
“These are designed to be self-contained, with 24/7 security and CCTV, to minimise the impact on the local community.”