“Mail-in ballots are inherently corrupt,” declared Donald Trump in July, without producing any evidence.
Yet just weeks later, he himself voted by mail in a Republican primary election in Florida. The US President has often voted by mail.
In fact, nearly a third of Americans vote by mail because it’s so convenient – a way to avoid long lines at polling stations. The first mail ballots of the midterm elections, which will determine control of Congress in November, are due to go out this week.

us news
Ex-gang boss found guilty over Tupac Shakur murder
Former gangland boss Duane “Keffe D” Davis, 63, has been found guilty of orchestrating the killing of rapper Tupac Shakur in 1996.
It is the first time anyone has been convicted over the infamous drive-by shooting.
What you need to know
- The jury found Davis guilty of one count of murder with a deadly weapon.
- Prosecutors argued that Davis did not fire the gun himself, but had masterminded the killing.
- He is a former gang leader and uncle of the man long suspected of shooting Tupac.
- After the verdict, Davis said he plans to appeal his conviction. He is due to be sentenced on 13 October.
What happened on the night
The cold case has rumbled on for decades, with witnesses allowing police to piece together the chain of events before the rapper died.
- On 7 September, 1996, Tupac went to watch a Mike Tyson boxing match on the Las Vegas strip.
- He and Marion “Suge” Knight, the head of his record label, got into a fight with Orlando Anderson, Duane Davis’s nephew and a suspected member of the South Side Compton Crips gang.
- Leaving the match with Suge, Tupac was shot four times in a drive-by shooting from the back of a white Cadillac.
- Six days later, on 13 September, he died in hospital. He was 25 years old.
What convinced the jury?
The prosecution used Davis’s 2019 memoir, , in which he wrote he had been in the white Cadillac when the shots were fired.


In closing arguments, prosecutor Binu Palal urged jurors to find Davis guilty, saying: “He’s the shot caller – in every instance in every iteration he’s the leader of the South Side Crips.”
Super flu vaccines start for pregnant women and children
Millions of children and pregnant women across England can get an updated flu vaccine from today.

Flu jabs: What you need to know
This year’s vaccine will protect against the Super-K strain which was rampant last year.- Schoolchildren and pregnant women will get priority as they can easily catch and spread flu.
- Other vulnerable groups, including those aged 65 and over, will be eligible for a free jab from October.
- Children over two will be offered the vaccine as a nasal spray, while adults will receive an injection.
- Pharmacies, GP surgeries and schools will offer the vaccines on the NHS.
Why is it important?

Dr Amanda Doyle, a national director at NHS England, said: “Last year’s flu season came early and was made worse by a new variant, which had a major impact for patients and put enormous pressure on urgent and emergency care services.”
She added: “With services already under significant pressure, it is vital that everyone offered the vaccine comes forward.”
Facts and figures
- Jabs will be given in locations including mobile vans.
- Last year’s flu season started a month early with the Super-K strain.
- Children are offered a vaccine in September as flu spreads quickly.
- Almost 19 million people had flu jabs last winter, preventing 104,000 hospital admissions.
uk politics
Burnham to tell MPs more public control needed

The Prime Minister is set to call for greater control over public services like water, energy and transport in his first House of Commons statement since entering No 10.
Burnham’s first test in the Commons
Today’s speech will be Burnham’s first time at the dispatch box in 16 years.
He is expected to face a two-hour grilling from MPs when he stands up in the Commons on Tuesday this afternoon.


On Wednesday, he will face Tory leader Kemi Badenoch during his first Prime Minister’s Questions.
Burnham is expected to face questions on how he plans to fill a £4.7bn black hole in defence spending.
Burnham has ‘clear plan’
- The PM is considering legislation to to bring struggling utilities under government ownership.
- He is set to tell MPs the cost of services to families is harming the economy.
- Burnham is set to promise a plan to regain control of these costs.
- A No 10 source said: “Andy is optimistic about our country’s future. He has a clear plan for how we turn things round.”
Yet Trump has for years railed against mail-in voting, blaming his 2020 election defeat on fraudulent postal ballots.
And since his return to power, he has turned these unfounded allegations into a campaign to end mail-in voting, part of wide-ranging measures by his administration that are aimed at bringing control of US elections under the federal government. Trump’s intense battle to give the US Postal Service more oversight of mail-in voting is causing mass disruption. And critics say it’s all aimed at orchestrating a Republican victory in November’s midterm elections.
Trump’s most devoted Make America Great Again (Maga) supporters have taken their cue from the President, believing that fraudulent postal ballots somehow cost Trump a second term in 2020.
In his second term, the President has relentlessly pressed Republican lawmakers to pass his SAVE America Act, which would (among other measures like valid ID and proof of citizenship when voting) get rid of mail-in ballots altogether – with exceptions for the military and for those who are ill or disabled.
However, there were simply not enough votes in the Republican-held Senate to pass this, and so the frustrated President changed tack and is targeting mail-in voting via one of his favourite procedural routes, the executive order.
This executive order gives the US Postal Service – a nominally independent branch of the federal government – the ability to refuse to deliver ballots to states that do not submit lists of eligible voters. Federal officials say the voter data will be used to identify noncitizens on state voter rolls. That’s another key theme for the President – the idea that people who are not Americans are fraudulently voting in large numbers, for his political opponents.
In a social media post late in August, Trump claimed that a Census Bureau analysis of more than 128 million voter records “proves that over 24,000 Noncitizens voted illegally” in the 2020 Presidential election and the final number will “explode” once the agency finishes its work. Critics say the methodology being used by the report is either disputed or unknown. Furthermore, the team behind it included people linked to a Trump-aligned think-tank, the America First Policy Institute, according to a Census Bureau employee cited by NPR.

Either way, 24,000 noncitizens voting out of 128 million would be just under 0.02 per cent. A study by the Brookings Institution found an average of four cases of mail voting fraud out of every 10 million mail votes cast across four general elections from 2016 to 2022.
Democrats see the President as trying to disenfranchise their voters, who are more likely to vote by mail. More than one in three Democrats voted by mail in 2024, compared with about one in four Republicans, according to estimates by the States United Democracy Center. As Trump railed against mail-in voting on the campaign trail in 2024, Democrats embraced the practice. The elderly and those living in rural areas far from polling stations have long voted by mail and now the very concept is embroiled in a legal battle. Eighteen per cent of black voters, one third of Hispanic voters and half of all Asian American voters cast mail ballots in 2024, according to the advocacy group Common Cause.
Unsurprisingly, this rule giving the hitherto humble US Postal Service a role in mail-in voting is being challenged in courts across the land. More than 20 Democratic-led states have sued to block the rule and said they will not comply with it. The Constitution gives states control over elections, argue their lawyers, who say this is a blatantly unconstitutional move by an administration that is trying to federalise control of voting. The Supreme Court has allowed the plan to go ahead on procedural grounds, but hasn’t said whether it’s legal. A federal judge in Boston blocked implementation of the executive order – the administration is appealing – and so the legal battle continues.
Even if ultimately the US Postal Service is allowed to refuse to send out ballots to states that won’t submit voter rolls for examination, the midterm elections are less than 70 days away and there may not be enough time left to implement a complex new system. The Postal Service has introduced regulations that include new mandates for the design of ballot envelopes, and individual bar codes. The US Postal Service has told states, “the visibility and law-enforcement benefits of the rule … are such that there is no compelling reason for any delay”.
Thus, there is every possibility that midterm election results in close races will be challenged by the President and his allies, who will argue that any mail-in ballots cast are invalid because they do not comply with these new rules. Trump has learned the lessons of the 2020 election, when his myriad legal challenges to Joe Biden’s victory were overturned by the courts. Now his administration is trying to rewrite the rules. Could the US Postal Service refuse to deliver ballots because the envelopes don’t have the right bar codes? That would cause absolute chaos. Watch how the complex legal battle plays out because the stakes are high and the Trump administration is ready for a fight.





