Manchester City have been found guilty of the vast majority of their rule-break charges concerning the Premier League’s financial regulations, Daily Mail Sport understands.
The competition accused the club of widespread financial cheating over an era of sustained success – with an independent panel hearing concluding in 2024.
There has since been a frustrating wait for a verdict but sources have disclosed that clubs have been informed that the panel has now reached a decision – and there is a belief it's a win for the top flight.
The verdict could lead to a variety of punishments including huge points deductions, financial penalties, and even relegation.
Points deductions could even be applied onto previous seasons, raising the chance that City will be stripped of their Premier League titles.
It is inevitable that they will appeal.

Manchester City have been found guilty of the vast majority of their 115 Premier League rule-break charges

The verdict could lead to a variety of punishments including huge points deductions, financial penalties, and even relegation
A Manchester City spokesperson said: 'The Premier League process remains ongoing, with significant elements to be completed, and subject to strict confidentiality. As such Manchester City FC’s position remains consistent with the Club’s statement of February 2023.
'The Club has diligently respected due process for eight years on the basis that the Premier League Board and Executive would behave as an independent, impartial and fair-minded regulator, free from partisan influence.'
Man City, who have always strongly denied wrongdoing, were charged in February 2023 by the Premier League with a hearing concluding in December 2024.
Their statement that February insisted that they were 'surprised' by the charges.
The Premier League accused Man City of multiple breaches of financial rules and of failing to co-operate with a subsequent investigation. The alleged rule breaking was claimed to have taken place over a 14-year period.
A three-man panel was tasked with considering the evidence, with the initial expectation a verdict would have been reached on the case within months. It has since taken three-and-a-half years.
The original 115 charges were extended to a total of 130 after an administration issue in what is the most expensive and wide-ranging case in English football history.
Manchester United legend Rio Ferdinand was quick to stick the boot in on social media, writing on X: 'Another Premier League medal to be added to the cabinet.'

The charges stretch from the years 2009 to 2023, encompassing much of the Pep Guardiola era

He was part of the United team who were famously pipped to the title by City on the final day of the 2011-12 season.
City remained steadfast in maintaining their innocence over more than 115 alleged breaches across eight years, some including the start of the Pep Guardiola era.
The club were accused of failing to report accurate financial information for nine seasons stretching from 2009-10 to 2017-18, as well as failing to provide full details of former manager Roberto Mancini’s pay between 2009-10 and 2012-13.
They were also alleged to have failed to provide full details of money paid to players between 2010-11 and 2015-16 and failing to co-operate with the probe from 2018 to 2023.
Between the years mentioned, Manchester City won eight Premier League titles, a Champions League, four FA Cups, and seven EFL Cups.
In 2022, Guardiola said he would quit the club if he felt the club's hierarchy had ever lied to him. The next year, he said he would not walk out on his deal, even if he was relegated to League One.
Guardiola always insisted he was 'fully convinced' that the club is innocent and said in May: 'I trust them, I trust them. Because I spoke with them and I trust how they behave and how they did.'
City vehemently denied any breaches of financial rules but the investigation started in December 2018 after German website Der Spiegel published documents from a Football Leaks cache which had originated from Portuguese hacker Rui Pinto.

It alleged that City had overstated sponsorship income with money paid from the club's owners instead of sponsors linked to Abu Dhabi.
Roberto Mancini's wages were said to have doubled via a secret contract with an Abu Dhabi club when he was at Man City, while they were also alleged to have broken rules over approaching young players.
The Mail on Sunday has led the way on reporting the story. In July 2021, they reported on emails that appeared to suggest that Man City had millions funnelled into the club by Abu Dhabi to help inflate their income.
Back in February 2020, the club were banned from the Champions League and fined £25million after they were found to have seriously misled European footballing governing body UEFA and broken financial fair play rules.
This was then lifted by the Court of Arbitration for Sport which also reduced the club's fine to £9m.
City spent £440million over the summer, equalling the British transfer record by signing Enzo Fernandez for £125million, and their former chairman David Bernstein claimed that 'makes a mockery' of the Premier League's regulation of the top division.
Writing in the Sunday Times, Bernstein said: 'The fact they have done this (transfer spend) against the background of the 115 Premier League charges is extraordinary and makes a mockery of regulation in England's top division, supposedly the best-run league in the world.'
It was a bumper summer for City after the exit of Guardiola. They also signed Elliot Anderson (£116m), Ayyoub Bouaddi (£86m), Iliman Ndiaye (£60m), Allan and Geronimo Rulli.

Enzo Maresca insisted that he was not worried about the situation when he became their manager in the summer
Other marquee signings down the years have included Jack Grealish for £100m, Erling Haaland for £51.2m, Josko Gvardiol for £77.6m, and Riyad Mahrez for £60m.
Four Premier League sides had reserved the right to seek compensation in the event City were found guilty.
Speaking to the BBC in August, Premier League chief executive Richard Masters described the case as 'hugely complex' as he defended the length of time taken to reach a conclusion.
'I do accept it is taking longer than expected and I understand that people want to find out as soon as possible what's going on, but I simply can't provide that,' he said.
'The process is the process,' he said. 'It will resolve itself. But as you know, I literally can't say a thing about it. There's only one available option, which is to allow the process to reach its natural conclusion. I can't talk about the substance of the case. I can't talk about the timing of the case. Our rules are very clear about that. I understand that people are frustrated but it will take as long as it takes.'
When Enzo Maresca, Guardiola's former assistant, took the managerial reins in the summer, he insisted that he wasn't worried about the situation.
He said: 'No, no, to be honest (they're not a concern.
'The only thing I can say is that three years ago, the treble season, I was here. And there were the same words about this kind of problem,” Maresca explained.

City spent £440m on players this summer, including a British record-equalling £125m on Enzo Fernandez to secure him from Chelsea
'In three years, it’s still the same, so nothing happened. I don’t have anything to say because it’s something that is there.'
The club have made a stunning start to the season, sitting top of the Premier League with five wins from as many games.
It is perhaps merciful that this decision has arrived towards the start of a three-week international break rather than during the cut and thrust of the domestic season.
The Premier League's latest domestic broadcast deal has seen the amount paid per game fall by around £2.5m.
Some have wondered if that is an indicator that fans are getting fed up of various litigations, with Nottingham Forest, Everton and Leicester City docked points in recent times.
Follow Manchester City found guilty LIVE: Latest on the punishment with relegation or expulsion as options
List of charges against Man City
Details of the Premier League Rules that the Man City is alleged to have breached are as follows:
1. In respect of each of Seasons 2009/10 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those seasons that required provision by a member club to the Premier League, in the utmost good faith, of accurate financial information that gives a true and fair view of the club's financial position, in particular with respect to its revenue (including sponsorship revenue), its related parties and its operating costs, namely:
(a) for Season 2009/10, Premier League Rules B.13, C.71, C.72, C.75 (amended to C.79 from 10 September 2009 for the remainder of Season 2009/10) and C.80;
(b) for Season 2010/11, Premier League Rules B.13, C.78, C.79, C.86 and C.87;
(c) for Season 2011/12, Premier League Rules B.13, E.3, 4, E.11 and E.12;
(d) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules 16, E.3, E.4, E.11 and E.12;
(e) for Season 2013/14, Premier League Rules 15, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.49;
(f) for Season 2014/15, Premier League Rules 16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.50;
(g) for Season 2015/16, Premier League Rules 16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.50;
(h) for Season 2016/17, Premier League Rules16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.51; and
(i) for Season 2017/18, Premier League Rules B.16, 3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.51.
2. In respect of:
(a) each of Seasons 2009/10 to 2012/13 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to include full details of manager remuneration in its relevant contracts with its manager, namely:
(1) for Seasons 2009/10 to 2011/12 inclusive, Premier League Rules Q.7 and Q.8; and
(2) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules P.7 and P.8; and
(b) each of Seasons 2010/11 to 2015/16 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to include full details of player remuneration in its relevant contracts with its players, namely:
(1) for Seasons 2010/11 and 2011/12, Premier League Rules K.12 and K.20;
(2) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules T.12 and T.20;
(3) for Seasons 2013/14 and 2014/15, Premier League Rules T.12 and T.19; and
(4) for Season 2015/16, Premier League Rules T.13 and T.20.
3. In respect of each of Seasons 2013/14 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to comply with UEFA's regulations, including UEFA's Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations, namely:
(a) for Season 2013/14, Premier League Rule B.14.6; and
(b) for Seasons 2014/15 to 2017/18 inclusive, Premier League Rule B.15.6.
4. In respect of each of the Seasons 2015/16 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons on Profitability and Sustainability, namely:
(a) for Season 2015/16, Premier League Rules E.52 to E.60; and
(b) for Seasons 2016/17 and 2017/18, Premier League Rules E.53 to E.60.
5. In respect of the period from December 2018 to date, the Premier League Rules applicable in the relevant Seasons requiring a member club to cooperate with, and assist, the Premier League in its investigations, including by providing documents and information to the Premier League in the utmost good faith, namely:
(a) for Season 2018/19, Premier League Rules B.16, B.19, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13;
(b) for Season 2019/20, Premier League Rules B.16, B.19, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13;
(c) for Season 2020/21, Premier League Rules B.16, B.19, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13;
(d) for Season 2021/22, Premier League Rules B.15, B.18, W.1, W.2, W.15 and W.16; and
(e) for Season 2022/23, Premier League Rules B.15, B.18, W.1, W.2, W.15 and W.16.