Given Donald Trump’s proclivity to only recognise the outcome of elections that Republicans win, his opponents had only one job: do nothing that might feed his argument that it’s the Democrats who are undermining American election integrity.
It now appears that Mary Peltola – the Democrat campaigning for an all-important Senate seat in Alaska in Tuesday’s US midterm elections – never got that memo.
In the final week of this year’s midterm cycle, the elections have been upended by stunning news of Democrat-orchestrated dirty tricks in Alaska that afforded Trump the opportunity to call for Peltola’s name to be removed from the ballot due to what he insisted was her involvement in “ELECTION FRAUD”.
How all over 16s could need ID to use social media
Ofcom has set out its recommendations for the most effective ways to identify which of the UK’s millions of social media users are aged over 16.

What you need to know

Under the UK’s social media ban – which comes into force in March next year – under 16s will be prevented from accessing 10 of the biggest platforms, including Instagram and TikTok.
Many adults are also likely to have to confirm that they are not under-age by using one of the proposed measures,
Ofcom’s recommendation
Age verification below 18 is difficult, because 16 and 17 year olds don’t have credit cards or full driving licences, and may not have passports.


To address that challenge, Ofcom has recommended four methods that it says would be “highly effective” at gauging people’s ages, in addition to traditional forms of ID.
The four methods
- Photo ID matching, where relevant information on a photo ID is checked against a live image.
- Banking-based checks – using the information on record regarding a user’s age.
- Face age estimation technology, which Ofcom argues has recently improved.
- Digital ID services, which enable people to digitally prove who they are or provide information about themselves, such as their age.

Why Toblerone owner is suing vegan chocolate brand
The owner of Toblerone is taking legal action against a small British vegan chocolate brand which it claims has been copying the Swiss chocolate bar’s iconic shape.
What you need to know
- Mondelēz has filed papers at the high court accusing Catherine’s Original’s of “passing off” and trademark infringement with its O’bar.
- The O’bar is a length of chocolate divided into segments each with a rounded semi-oval hump.

Catherine’s Originals, founded by Catherine Dodd in 2021, makes its chocolate in Sussex and sells them via markets and online.
- Mondelēz International said: “The iconic Toblerone shape is one of the most recognised and distinctive product designs in the UK and across the world, and has been a hallmark of the brand since 1929.
- “We have a responsibility to protect our trademarks and intellectual property, which we take seriously.”
- The legal battle comes after Poundland was forced to delay the launch of its Twin Peaks bar in 2017 after a legal warning from Mondelēz.
What O’bar founder has said
We stand firmly behind the product and identity we’ve created. We strongly disagree with the claim concerning O’bar and are working with our legal team to defend our position. Honestly, it’s fairly frightening for a small business we’ve put so much care and hard work into building.
catherine dodd


The tax rises Healey didn’t tell you about
In John Healey’s Budget he promised to make Britain “more resilient” to global shocks and pledged to give families a £100m payment to help with energy costs, and offer a tax break for low income pensioners.
But the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has warned living standards will be challenged by higher energy costs and a ballooning tax burden. Here are all the hidden tax rises in Wednesday’s Budget.
Energy bills

The Chancellor announced a series of pledges to curb rising energy costs, promising the beginning of “radical reform”.
This includes a £100 payment towards energy costs for up to 20 million households in council tax bands A to D.


However, these fixed daily charges on gas bills will be shifted onto the price consumers pay for each unit of energy.
Energy bills
The Treasury has claimed that 60 per cent of households will save an average of £45 a year.
But the savings will only come after the big projected rise to energy bills in January. While lower users will gain the most, higher users – which includes large, low-income families – are likely to pay more than they currently do.
High tax bands for millions
- Millions face being dragged into paying more income tax after the thresholds remained frozen.
- The IFS warned it was a Budget with “very little that will move the dial on growth”.

The effect, known as fiscal drag, occurs when tax thresholds remain frozen while wages rise – meaning people pay more tax as a greater proportion of their income becomes taxable or they are pushed into higher tax bands.
Middle-income pensioners
- Pensioners with income less than the full amount of the new state pension will not have to pay income tax, Healey announced.
- However, middle and higher income pensioners face a squeeze due to related tax rules.
- Healey said that to avoid a “cliff edge” once a pension income exceeds the allowance, the Government would “gradually” reduce the allowance as income increases.
Middle-income pensioners
- The Government said this means those earning between £13,037 and £13,319 will receive “some Pension Tax Allowance and pay less income tax than you otherwise would”.
- But Sir Steve Webb, former pensions minister, said this means around 200,000 low-income pensioners will face a marginal income tax rate of 53 per cent.
- For each extra pound above the cut-off, they pay 20p in income tax and lose 33p in the tax rebate that those on lower incomes get, he said.

READ THE FULL STORY HERE
Higher housing costs
The Chancellor announced that the surcharge on bank profits would be temporarily doubled from 3 to 6 per cent and that landlords face a 4 per cent tax on rental profits and property income.
But critics are warning higher costs will be passed onto renters and onto people securing mortgages.

John denies postponing difficult welfare system decisions
John Healey has denied postponing difficult decisions on the welfare system, insisting the Government is making changes “now”.
The Chancellor’s Budget has faced criticism for not dealing with the ballooning cost of welfare, including from Kemi Badenoch, who said the country is “drowning in an out-of-control welfare system”.
What you need to know
- The influential Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank warned the Budget delayed tough decisions.
- Speaking to , Healey said ministers have already brought in a range of measures to cut the cost.
- The Chancellor told BBC Radio 4’s that the Government “can never remove completely the cost of living pressures that people feel”.
Two years ago we started putting back in place face-to-face assessments. We’ve changed terms of universal credit, so people don’t have to brand themselves as too sick to work. So, those are changes we’re making now. But in the long run, as I’ve argued, and the Prime Minister has said, too, we have to bring the cost of down.
healey told gb news


go deeper on this topic
How much benefit payments will rise by
Benefit claimants will see their payments boosted next year in a move that could cost the Government up to £5.5bn, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
Some 10 million Britons claiming working-age benefits are set to see a rise of at least 3.5 per cent from next spring, with ministers expected to increase rates in line with inflation.

What to know as ‘error’ blamed for Spain train crash
At least 68 people died and dozens more were injured following a “rear-end collision” between two trains in central Spain.
What happened?
The crash occurred between the towns of Los Yébenes and Urda, in the Toledo province, shortly before 9am local time (8am UK time) on Wednesday.
- A train operated by the state-owned national rail company Renfe carrying 397 passengers, rammed into the back of a stationary train operated by private firm Iryo, carrying 147 people.
- The crash caused at least two carriages to fall down an embankment.
- Former Spanish government minister, Fátima Báñez, was among those killed in the incident, local authorities confirmed.
- Three days of national mourning have now been declared to honour the victims.
What caused the crash?
Spain’s Transport minister Óscar Puente said a computer failure led to the initial halt of six moving trains.


Puente also suggested that the accident may have been caused by human error because one of the trains had been told to resume its journey. He said it was the control centre, through its operators, that made the decision to resume traffic which he said was “inexplicable”.
The story in pictures



What has Spain’s PM said?
The whole of Spain is grieving. Lives have been shattered, families have been torn apart, the pain is immense.
Pedro Sanchez

go deeper on this topic
Why train crashes are more common in Spain

Earlier this year, a collision between two high-speed trains in southern Spain killed 39 people. But what does the data on Spain’s train crashes say, and which are the safest European railways?
us news
Hayden Panettiere’s death ruled accidental

Police have closed the investigation into Hayden Panettiere’s death after a post-mortem found .
The actress died in August after being found unresponsive in an apartment in the South Carolina city of Greenville.
No signs of foul play
Panettiere’s on-and-off boyfriend Brian Hickerson and his brother Zach were in the property at the time. Paramedics performed CPR and other resuscitation efforts for 40 minutes before declaring her dead.
Officers initially said there did not appear to be any signs of foul play – an assessment backed up by last month’s post-mortem.
Cause of death revealed
The coroner ruled Panettiere died from the toxic effects of an accidental overdose of several drugs, including the synthetic opioid fentanyl.


The other drugs found in her system were anti-anxiety medicine alprazolam, muscle relaxer methocarbamol, and quetiapine – which can be used to treat depression.
Panettiere had been in rehab a few weeks before death.

A quick guide to this year’s Budget
This is a Budget for the working people.
Chancellor John Healey unveiled the long-anticipated Budget yesterday, the first for Prime Minister Andy Burnham. Healey called it a Budget “for the working people” as he announced details.
So what are the key takeaways?
Cheaper energy
- This winter, 20 million households in council tax bands A to D will receive a £100 energy payment paid directly into people’s bank accounts – a £2.6bn scheme.
- Gas standing charges will be removed from next year, and similar reforms will follow for electricity.
- The Chancellor says he will remove some levies on energy bills.
- He also extended a VAT cut on electricity to July 2027, cutting £50 off the annual price cap.
Savings and pensions
- The tax-free limit on cash ISAs will stay at £20,000, abandoning plans to reduce it to £12,000.
- “To make the investment more accessible, I will work with the sector to create a new starter ISA to reward first-time investors,” Healey said.

A new pension tax allowance will be introduced. “Pensioners with income up to the value of the full new state pension will not pay income tax in this parliament,” Healey said.
Benefits and paternity leave
- A benefits rule that punished unpaid carers for earning too much is being abolished. Now, if they earn any amount above the threshold set by means-testing (£204 a week), they lose the whole carer’s allowance.
- This will be replaced, Healey announced.
- Self-employed dads and same-sex partners will also be eligible for two weeks’ support worth up to £194 a week.
3.9%
The Chancellor announced a rise in the minimum wage by nearly 3.9 per cent, the same rate for workers aged 18 to 20 years old and those aged 21 and over.
The Chancellor promises to reform non-compete clauses in contracts.
- Healey also said he will extend the fuel duty cut until July 2027.
- Workers using their car to get to work can be reimbursed a greater amount by their employers tax-free – the higher mileage rate will increase from 25p to 35p per mile.
The threshold for small business rate relief will increase from £12,000 to £18,000 for retail, hospitality and leisure.
Healey will also raise taxes on the gambling industry to pay for the changes. A £10m alcohol duty relief will be provided for around 2,000 small British brewers and cider makers.
For months, Peltola has insisted that neither she nor her campaign had anything to do with the mystery appearance of a third candidate on Alaska’s ballot paper named Daniel J Sullivan. Sullivan, a retired teacher from a remote fishing village in the Alaska Panhandle, has no previous experience of running for office, and his candidacy came as a surprise to Republican Party grandees.
Their alarm bells rang because the incumbent Republican Senator battling for re-election is named Dan S. Sullivan.
The appearance of another Dan Sullivan on the ballot did not pass the smell test as far as Republicans were concerned, but Democrats denied vehemently that the former teacher had been recruited in an effort to confuse Republican voters and siphon support away from the party’s legitimate, incumbent candidate.

Last week, the US Department of Justice launched legal action in an effort to block the outcome of the race in Alaska in the event that Senator Sullivan loses to Peltola. Alaska’s Supreme Court ruled in June that both Sullivans could appear on the ballot, and last week Trump’s lawyers offered no concrete evidence that the Democratic Party had orchestrated attempted voter fraud.
But on Wednesday, provided evidence aplenty that operatives aligned with Peltola “spent months recruiting candidates to peel votes away” from Senator Sullivan.
In a nation that anticipates an “October Surprise” in every election cycle, the newspaper’s investigation found that Democrats spent months scouring Alaska to find another Dan Sullivan willing to run as a Republican against the real one. Democratic Party operatives are reported to have spent the summer “combing through voter records to produce a list of Dan Sullivans from across the state”.
Peltola’s former campaign manager, Elisa Rios, told that the Democratic candidate was “definitely aware” of the project to try and split the Republican vote. “Voters should get the full picture when making their decision,” she said.
It now turns out that the second Dan Sullivan may not be the only allegedly fraudulent candidate appearing on the Alaska ballot. News Nation TV reported on Wednesday that another Republican, Gerald Heikes, claims that he was also recruited by an “operative” who met with him, urged him to get in the race as a Republican, and promised to support him if he did.

Heikes’s name appears on the ballot, and his spoiler campaign has been infused with more than $2m (£1.5m) of advertising support by a mystery political action committee called Alaska Values. Its website offers no indication of how it is funded, and under federal law it is not required to unmask its donors until after the election has ended next week. Republicans believe it is supported by Democrats specifically seeking to fund campaigns designed to create voter confusion.
Peltola’s campaign, a narrow two points ahead of Senator Sullivan in opinion polls, continues to deny any involvement in the subterfuge. “Our campaign is focused on lowering costs and fixing the rigged system in DC and did not recruit any candidates into the race,” the Peltola campaign insists. But Trump is welcoming the Democrats’ own goal, which plays directly into his false claims that his opponents are unable to win elections fair and square.
“The Democrats cheated!” he fumed on his Truth Social account, claiming the recruitment of the second Sullivan was carried out “in order to defraud, confuse, and obfuscate the Election, thereby taking votes away from the REAL Senator”. In a cadence that may be repeated ceaselessly after polling closes nationwide next Tuesday, Trump insisted the Alaska Democrats are committing “Voter Fraud at the Highest Level”.
Earlier this week, the President was asked whether he will respect the midterms’ outcome. “I will, if they’re honest elections,” he answered. Now, from Alaska, comes an unexpected last-minute gift that may grease the wheels of Trump’s efforts to portray the national election results as illegitimate.
The nightmare scenario for the country will play out if control of the Senate is so evenly poised that it hinges on the outcome of the Alaska race. Democrats, and indeed the country, may rue the day they lit upon their wizard wheeze in the Alaska outback.










