It’s come to something when repeated on-camera denials from Andy Burnham that he has no plans to call a general election are blithely discounted.
“I don’t know how many times I’ve done this now but yes, I can rule out calling a general election in the next 12 months,” the Prime Minister said wearily on Wednesday. It won’t be enough to stop the chatter.
Westminster’s army of sofa Kremlinologists, tooled up with strong coffee and confirmation-bias, likes nothing more than election speculation, safe in the knowledge that, like a clock that stops every five years, they’ll eventually be right.
Do at-home vitamin D tests really work? What we know
At-home vitamin D tests may give unreliable results and prevent consumers seeking help for genuine deficiencies, a watchdog has warned.

A significant deficiency
Vitamin D deficiency is common in the UK, partly due to a lack of adequate sunlight during the winter months, although factors such as diet and age can also play a role.
However, consumer organisation Which? has claimed to have found significant variations across rapid self-testing kit results versus laboratory blood tests for deficiency.
Testing the test kits
- The watchdog bought five widely available rapid vitamin D tests, all costing around £8 at retailers including Amazon, Lloyds Pharmacy, Waitrose and Boots.
- Results from the same person were compared with a registered laboratory test on the same day, which showed vitamin D levels within a sufficient range.
- However, the self-testing kits gave different results.
50 nmol/L
A reading higher than 50 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L) is considered a sufficient level of vitamin D.
An insufficient result indicates a user’s levels are below the ideal range, while a deficient result suggests levels could pose a risk to health.
75 nmol/L
However, rapid self-testing kits use a higher cut off of 75 nmol/L as a sufficient level.
This should mean more people will be flagged as insufficient compared with an NHS-ordered blood test.
The findings
The Which? researcher would therefore have been expected to fall within the insufficient range on the self-testing kits, given their laboratory result showed them to be within the 50 nmol/L range.
- Only two self-test results in the Which? study suggested .
- Two others indicated – markedly lower than the level indicated by the researcher’s lab blood test.
- The result indicated a sufficient level of vitamin D.
The risks
Which? warned that inaccurate results could leave consumers unnecessarily worried about their health, falsely reassured or buying supplements they don’t need.


The Royal College of Pathologists says taking too much vitamin D over time can cause high levels of calcium in the blood, with complications including kidney stones. Meanwhile, not treating a deficiency can increase the risk of osteoporosis over time.
People turn to at-home health checks for peace of mind and as a way of managing their own health so it is deeply concerning that tests sold by major high street brands and online gave completely contradictory results
Sue Davies, Which? head of consumer rights and food policy


The radical new breast cancer trials to cut radiotherapy

Women with early-stage breast cancer could be spared multiple rounds of gruelling radiotherapy under a “breakthrough” cancer trial. Here’s what we know.
What we know
The Fast-Forward Boost trial is running at 39 hospitals across the UK and will test a shorter course of radiotherapy with an additional targeted dose known as a “boost” to help stop breast cancer returning.


The Government-funded trial is testing whether breast cancer radiotherapy can be safely cut from three weeks to just five days, potentially sparing women 10 hospital visits.
Aim to improve quality of life
- Radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer is very effective but can be gruelling for patients.
- Treatment is required over several weeks and there are side effects as well as emotional strain.
- Reducing the rounds of treatment may improve patients’ quality of life, cutting travel costs and time away from work and family.
- It could also free up NHS capacity to treat more people.
Scale of the trial
1,000
More than 1,000 people have joined the trial.
Researchers hope to recruit more than 4,000 people for overall.
2033
Participants will be monitored for five years.
Results of the trial are expected in 2033.
Builds on prior research
The trial is being led by the Institute of Cancer Research, London, and funded through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).
It builds on previous research, with a similar approach already having been adopted for other conditions such as low- to intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer.

Why Google stock plunged £500bn in a single day
Google’s parent company, Alphabet, lost over $500bn (£374bn) in value on Thursday after it spooked Wall Street with its last update of the year.

Revenue up, profits down
$127.6bn
Alphabet’s total quarterly revenue was up by 25 per cent compared to last year.
Revenue in Google Cloud grew by 103 per cent to nearly $31bn (£23bn), with total company revenue at $127.6bn (£95bn).
- However, Alphabet’s profits fell by 25 per cent during the quarter.
- For the second time in its history as a public company, it also showed negative free cash flow amounting to $9bn (£6.7bn).
Why are investors panicking?
- Negative free cash flow means the company is spending more money than it is bringing in.
- The company’s new level of spending is largely dedicated to investments in AI.
- Google’s search engine now defaults to presenting AI summaries of people’s search queries at the top of results.
- But the company revealed these AI summaries are affecting ad revenue.
The importance of ad sales


The revelation has worried investors because sales of ads that appear next to Google search results accounts for the majority of Alphabet’s business.
Following the revelation to investors, Alphabet’s total stock market value had fallen to $3.46trn (£2.58trn) by the end of trading on Thursday, down from $3.97trn (£2.96trn) the day before. Tracy Woo, a principal analyst at Forrester, said Alphabet’s disappointing results “highlight the challenge of funding massive AI investments while maintaining the strength of established businesses”.

The most complained about broadband companies revealed
Communications and media watchdog Ofcom has revealed Britain’s most complained about broadband providers in recent months.
The latest numbers
Ofcom said its latest data, covering the quarter from April to June, showed that total complaint numbers were lower than the previous quarter.


It linked the drop in complaints specifically to fewer issues from customers regarding pay-TV services, while complaints about broadband, landline and mobile services stayed roughly the same.
Level of complaints
- Ofcom’s latest data showed BT, EE, TalkTalk and Vodafone reported seven broadband complaints per 100,000 customers.
- Virgin Media was the UK broadband provider to receive the fewest complaints, with four per 100,000 customers.
- It was followed by Plusnet and Sky, which both received five per 100,000 customers.
Change from previous quarter

No change for BT
BT’s figure was flat against the previous quarter.
EE saw an increase in quarterly complaints.


Others see drop
TalkTalk and Vodafone both reported a reduction in complaints.

Sir Patrick Stewart’s life and career – in pictures
The veteran actor, Sir Patrick Stewart, who starred in and has died at his home in Los Angeles, aged 86.
Here, we take a look at his life and work.
- Stewart’s death followed a “brief and poignant journey with Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy body dementia”.
- He is survived by his wife Sunny Ozell, his children Daniel and Sophie from a previous marriage, and grandchildren.
- Sir Ian McKellen, Stewart’s close friend and co-star who officiated his 2013 wedding, led tributes to “the most respected and beloved actor of his generation either side of the Atlantic”.
Stewart’s early acting years
Born in Mirfield, West Yorkshire, in 1940, Stewart began acting aged 12 at an eight-day drama course.


In his mid-20s, he joined the Royal Shakespeare Company, and continued to act on stage throughout his career.
Stewart shot to fame when he originated the role of Captain Jean-Luc Picard in Star Trek: The Next Generation in 1987.

Sci-fi stardom
The sci-fi TV series ran for seven years, with films in 1994 and in 1996. Stewart later said the success of the show created difficulties as directors did not want to cast the captain of the Starship Enterprise in their films.


Beginning in 2000, Stewart took on his biggest movie role as Marvel superhero Professor Charles Xavier in the X-men franchise. He reprised the role repeatedly over the following decades, including in the upcoming film.
Other roles
Stewart’s other TV appearances include , and Fall of Eagles, in which he played Russian revolutionary Lenin. He briefly appeared in in the 1960s and was a series regular on Seth Macfarlane’s , voicing Deputy Director Bullock. He also worked with Macfarlane on and .


Honours and recognition
Stewart became an OBE in 2001 and was knighted in 2009. His various acting accolades include two Laurence Olivier Awards and a Grammy Award.
The lifelong Huddersfield Town fan counted becoming chancellor of the University of Huddersfield among his proudest achievements.
- Stewart was a vocal supporter of assisted dying, saying that people “should have the choice to die at home on their own terms.” He also called for a “people’s vote” after the 2016 Brexit referendum.
- His other activisim included advocating for victims of domestic violence, having revealed that his father was abusive to his mother. In 2018, he called for medicinal cannabis to be legalised.

What to know as crypto industry suffers ‘largest heist in history’
Cryptocurrency worth billions has been stolen from a major exchange in what has been termed “the largest bank heist in human history”.

What we know
Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange platform, was targeted by a “complex attack” involving more than $6.3bn (£4.7bn) in digital currency. Around half of the affected assets have been frozen, the crypto giant said.


Deposits and withdrawals have been temporarily “disabled” but as of 8am UK time on Friday, the hacker was still thought to control about $2.4bn (£1.8bn) worth of Bitcoin and Ether, the two biggest cryptocurrencies by valuation.
Detail on suspected hackers
- Several crypto analytics firms said the hack resembled previous North Korean-linked incidents.
- Binance is yet to attribute blame but said initial investigations suggest the hack “may have started with a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop”.
- That “gave an attacker access to a service container, where they submitted unauthorized withdrawal transactions”.
The attacker did not simply use one engineer’s permissions, and this was not a single ‘one-click’ action. It involved a more complex attack process.
Richard Teng, Binance’s co-CEO

Unprecedented scale and speed
Emily Taylor, co-founder of the Global Signal Exchange, told the BBC the hack set a “grim new record” and was conducted “on a speed and scale we’ve never seen”.


The hack is thought to have been planned for at least 36 hours and carried out in about 20 minutes. It is understood to eclipse the scale of the previous largest breach, a $1.5bn (£1.1bn) North Korea-linked hack on the Bybit exchange last year.
Could the UK really be facing a ‘catastrophic decade’?

The Government’s plans to help households with the cost of living will not prevent “catastrophic” living standards from falling, a leading think-tank has warned.
Helen Miller, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), said in her post-Budget analysis: “This decade looks set to be the worst decade for growth in household incomes on record.”


The think-tank warned the average median income will fall by 3 per cent from 2027 to the end of the decade.
Chancellor narrows his options
The IFS criticised Chancellor John Healey for choosing to fund a £4.7bn black hole in the defence investment plan in part from the Treasury’s reserves. This further narrows Healey’s options to keep spending plans on course in the event of another global economic shock, the think-tank said, and suggests he could face rampant speculation about tax rises ahead of the next Budget.
A clear short-term risk with the Chancellor’s choices is that next year, with low headroom and a spending review that looks pretty brutal for some departments, we see another season of damaging speculation about tax rises.
IFS director, helen miller

Bacon butties and grumbling MPs: Inside Healey’s first Budget

When John Healey stood up at the Despatch Box to deliver his maiden Budget on Wednesday, he had reason to feel confident.

Does testosterone really help improve menopause brain fog?
There is “insufficient” evidence to back the claim that testosterone can improve brain fog and memory symptoms linked to the menopause, a new study suggests.
Social media is “flooded” with claims that testosterone can improve these symptoms in menopausal women, experts said.
What you need to nkow
While there is anecdotal information that testosterone can help, experts stressed that there is currently not enough evidence to establish the effect. Experts at University College London said testosterone prescriptions have increased in the UK, reflecting growing interest in its role during menopause.
The team reviewed five studies which looked at whether testosterone can improve memory in post menopausal women.
A closer look at the detail
244 women
Some 244 women with an average age of 57 involved in the review were given either a placebo or testosterone at varying levels.
- The research team did not find significant improvements for cognitive function among participants taking testosterone.
- “The findings should be interpreted as insufficient to establish an effect, rather than as evidence of no effect,” the authors wrote in the journal Reproduction And Fertility.
The expert view
While there may be some anecdotal evidence for this in perimenopausal women, we cannot claim testosterone improves cognition during menopause without further evidence. More research is needed to understand any links between and brain health.
Professor Aimee Spector, senior author of the study and director of the UCL Menopause Mind Lab

And you can see why. Burnham seems more focused on his goals for the world following the next election than on the immediate next few years. Reforming social care, amending the pension triple lock, voting reform, and pursuing European Union membership are all priorities for the next parliament, not this one.
A kick-the-can Budget that didn’t tackle the ballooning welfare bill or defence spending did nothing to dispel the notion that Burnham is going to head to the country much earlier than the 2029 deadline.
One poll last week even put Labour on 30 per cent, 10 points clear of Reform UK and eight points ahead of the Tories. Win an election, say the pundits to the Prime Minister. Then, with a fresh mandate, impose the tax rises that would allow him to meet his ambitions to increase spending and expand the reach of the welfare state.
The trouble is, it’s just not true. No one in the cash-strapped Labour Party is preparing for an election beyond starting the normal process of fundraising. It is simply mischief-making by the opposition parties. The Tories even convinced themselves Burnham might use his party conference speech to call an election. This week the Liberal Democrats let it be known they put the chance of a poll on 10 December at 30 per cent.
In 2007 Gordon Brown stood on the brink of a calling a snap election. Within weeks, he had backed away. Then the Tories handed out stunt bottles of Newcastle Ale labelled “Bottler Brown”. This autumn they tried to repeat the trick, handing baffled journalists at their conference water with a “Bottler Burnham” label on it.
The Prime Minister’s political opponents should take the advice of savant, Regina George: stop trying to make “fetch” happen.
“The opposition parties are trying to push us into a Gordon Brown-esque situation and create the speculation from which we feel we can’t back down without looking like we are bottling it,” a very senior Labour source said.
“I think our political rivals are doing exactly what I would do in their situation and trying to make sure speculation hits fever pitch, so it looks like a backing down when something that was never going to happen doesn’t happen,” the source added.
The same people who would plot an election including No 10 Chief of Staff James Purnell and First Secretary of State Louise Haigh are busy with their day jobs, which includes writing the 10-year plan for government, due to be published in early December after a major speech on Europe.
“Andy wants a series of meaningful conversations off the back of the 10-year plan and that doesn’t point to an election,” an ally of his said.
There are also some clues to be found in the Budget documents. The fiscal rules are on a three-year lead time. What matters is what the Chancellor says he will do to bring down debt and borrowing three years hence, not actually doing it.
On Wednesday, John Healey said he would bring down debt in 2029-30, which also happens to be the year of a general election. This time next year, when he presents his spending review of tough choices (just don’t call it austerity), he could push those on-paper cuts to 2030-31, the year after the latest possible date for an election.
If, instead, departmental hard choices are pencilled in for 2029-30 then it would be time to head to Ladbrokes for a punt on an election in May 2028 because no one realistically expects Burnham to fight an election after slashing spending. “The smart money is on May [20]28,” a minister said this week.
In the meantime, Donald Trump might have ended his war in the Middle East, energy prices and inflation may come down and the economic picture could look brighter. If not, Burnham needs to convince the public if he wants to run an election campaign on a foundation of tax rises.
“After the spending review, Andy can say to the public, ‘we have done what we can within the limit of the existing envelope’ and then you start rolling the pitch for tax rises,” a Labour insider said. “You have a national conversation about what people want and are prepared to pay for and then Andy can say to voters: ‘I know this is what you want because you’ve been talking about it’.”
Inside Labour right now the turkeys don’t want an election for Christmas. “There is zero enthusiasm in the PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party] for an election that might deliver Andy his own personal mandate but deprive a lot of us our jobs,” a Labour MP said.
Whatever the evidence, it won’t stop Westminster’s professional class of drama llamas.














