Five men have been arrested on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act, and of offences under the Explosives Act, near the RAF Fairford base. The five men are all UK nationals, believed to live in London.
That is all most of us know about whatever has happened near RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire, after a large-scale operation was launched in the early hours of Sunday morning – possibly following a tip-off call from a concerned passerby. A village near the air force base has been evacuated for the safety of the public, raising further questions and alarm.
Whatever seems to be going on here, it’s clearly significant: The Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, skipped a scheduled football match at the Labour Party Conference, and the government said that the Defence Secretary, Wes Streeting, had also been briefed on the matter.
Avanti West Coast trains to be nationalised

The Transport Secretary said the operator has been underperforming “for years” as it becomes the latest service to be brought back into public ownership.
Andy Burnham said the service had failed people “time and time again” with cancellations and overcrowding.
What you need to know
- Avanti West Coast train services will be nationalised from March 2027, when its contract ends.
- Its London hub is Euston station, with services running to Wales, Manchester, Liverpool, Blackpool and Scotland.
- All train services under Department for Transport contracts, including Avanti, are in the process of being transferred to public ownership.
Reactions from the sector
“For years, we’ve heard stories of Avanti underperforming, with passengers left paying the price. Enough is enough,” Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said.


Conversely, Andy Mellors, managing director at Avanti West Coast, said: “We’re proud of what we’ve achieved over the last six years – from refurbishing our Pendolino fleet and introducing our new Evero trains to running more services than ever before.”
The results for customers
- Labour claims nationalisation will mean fewer delays and cancellations.
- This is thanks to a £10m investment in power and signalling maintenance, faster and more reliable services, upgraded facilities at Euston, and more stable internet connection on board trains.

Several rail firms around the country are already publicly owned, including Great Anglia and South Western Railway.

Chess prodigy, 11, becomes youngest woman grandmaster
A London schoolgirl has made history while representing England at the 46th Chess Olympiad in Uzbekistan.
Former chancellor, Rachel Reeves, called the young player “a chess superstar”.
After she won the British Women’s Championship earlier this year, she said: “I want to become a [full] grandmaster as soon as possible.”

- She now has two of the three “norms” required to become an International Master, the next rank up on the path to becoming a grandmaster.
Women and child die attempting to cross Channel

A 10-year-old child and two women in their 30s have died just off the coast of France, near Calais.
Andy Burnham’s spokesman said the tragedy was a “stark reminder of the dangers posed by criminal gangs”.
The timeline of events
What happened this morning and when:
- The dinghy pushed off from Bleriot Plage, near Calais, on Monday morning.
- French maritime police received a distress call after the boat got into trouble in the water.
- A rescue ship and Navy helicopter were sent to the scene with a medical team.
- The emergency responders were unable to save the child and two women.
- French officials said the deaths were likely due to crushing rather than drowning, due to overcrowding on the boat.
The official response
The Prime Minister’s official spokesperson said: “We’re deeply saddened to hear about the deaths in France today.
“It is a stark reminder of the dangers posed by the criminal gangs who exploit vulnerable people for profit, and we will continue to work relentlessly.”
An investigation has been opened into the incident.

What we know so far about RAF Fairford ‘bomb plot’
Five men were arrested on terror charges and villagers evacuated from their homes after a major incident was declared near the RAF Fairford airbase used by the US Air Force.
Aerial footage showed a bomb disposal robot inspecting three white vans in the area.
What are they accused of?
- The men were initially arrested on suspicion of Explosives Act offences.
- Police were called out to three suspicious vans heading towards the airbase in Gloucestershire at 12.45am on Sunday.
- The five men were later further arrested on suspicion of the preparation of a terrorist act, with counter-terrorism policing officers now leading the investigation.
How were they caught?
A local farmer spotted the seemingly abandoned white vans blocking a quiet country road a few hundred metres from RAF Fairford when driving home from a party.
The farmer told she saw a group of “young” men, some wearing “masks or balaclavas”, running into the trees and across fields towards the airbase. She called the police and warned neighbours to lock their doors.

RAF Fairford’s links to Iran war
A senior Western intelligence source told The i Paper the assumption is that those involved in this incident are likely to be proxies for a hostile state. Iran is understood to be the leading suspect.
- The US Air Force has used RAF Fairford to carry out bombing missions against Iran in a bid to protect ships in the Strait of Hormuz.
- In July, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) warned against allowing US bombers to fly from British bases, saying such sites would be legitimate targets.
- A UK Government spokesperson said at the time: “Our armed forces are ready to keep the United Kingdom safe from any kind of attacks, whether it’s on our soil or from abroad.”
- Inquiries have yet to rule out Russia or even domestic activity.
What did the police say?
I can’t go into details, but I can give reassurance that we believe the matter to be contained and as a set of agencies working together across Gloucestershire, we are gathering and responding to local intelligence all the time.
Gloucestershire Police temporary Chief Constable, Maggie Blyth.

How puzzles may ‘reduce age-related cognitive decline’
Researchers found memory, logic and reasoning puzzles with advice on diet and exercise, can help improve thinking and memory problems.

How the study works
- The study examined people aged 60-85 with low cognitive scores.
- They were split into three groups. One group was given evidence-based advice on diet.
- The second used a website called Active Brains, which provides cognitive exercises in the form of puzzles.
- The third group were directed to the same website and also given “brief support” with a nurse.
The study’s findings
- After 12 months, all groups showed improvement in their cognitive scores and a significant proportion no longer met the criteria for age-related cognitive decline.
- 28 per cent of people who were given simple lifestyle advice were no longer deemed to have cognitive decline.
- This increased to 33 per cent of those directed to the website and 32 per cent of those directed to the website and given additional support.
- Among those directed to the website and given additional support, there was an 18 per cent reduction in severe cognitive impairment compared to those who were just given advice, researchers found.
Hear from the researchers
Professor Paul Little, co-lead of the study, said: “These are really exciting findings that people can easily take on board.
“Simple messages and simple things that people can do really make a difference – and the NHS does not need to spend a lot of money.”


He added the research team was “surprised” by the cognitive improvement seen among people just given “brief advice”.

Sycamore Gap stump shows new shoots three years after felling
Three years after it was illegally felled, photos show a thick ring of new shoots around the stump of the sycamore tree made famous by 1991’s Robin Hood Prince of Thieves.
What happened to it?
The tree, which was planted in the late 1800s in Northumberland, was illegally felled in September 2023 by Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers, causing national outcry.
In 2025, the pair were jailed for four years and three months for criminal damage for cutting down the iconic tree with a chainsaw.


Slow recovery starts to show
Now, the National Trust, which operates the site at Hadrian’s Wall, has revealed the stump has shown new growth.


Since it was felled, the remaining stump has been protected by a barrier, allowing nature to take its course and new green shoots to spring up.
Promising signs
These flourishing shoots are really encouraging and show that the special measures we’ve taken, including reducing soil compaction around the roots and limiting human disturbance, are paying off.
Andrew Poad, general manager for the National Trust at Hadrian’s Wall

How triple lock could be axed to pay for national care service

Andy Burnham’s plan to put free social care in Labour’s next general election manifesto could be part of a grand bargain to drop the state pension triple lock, Labour MPs believe.
What you need to know
- A Labour MP told The i Paper that introducing the NHS-style care service would be a “politically smart” way to “sugar the pill” of finally scrapping the lock
- On Sunday, the PM kicked off Labour’s conference in Liverpool by vowing to put forward a plan to voters at the next election in which “everyone contributes, everyone is covered” for social care.
- In private, many MPs across the political spectrum confide that the lock is fundamentally unsustainable over the long term.
Figures chime in

The think-tank said an Australian-style system would deliver savings of about £650m by 2030.
The ex-cabinet minister said getting rid of the triple lock is “an option that the Government should consider”.


The junior minister suggested tax rises would be needed to fund the policy, saying it “isn’t going to be cheap”.
A word of warning
A backbencher cautioned that Burnham would have to tread carefully. “We will need to try and secure a cross-party consensus on adult social care,” they said.
Back in 2017, Theresa May proposed replacing the triple lock with a “double lock”. The policy was dubbed a “dementia tax” and the Tories subsequently lost their majority.

Beyond that, though, UK officials have been keeping their lips shut on that. There are several reasons they may do so: contempt of court rules in the UK forbid the reporting of some details once suspects have been arrested, in order to guarantee them a fair trial.
For cases that may involve national security – and it is hard to see how explosives and terror offences near a major airbase could involve national security – these precautions can be even more significant. Authorities might be trying to track down additional suspects they believe might be involved in a plot, or chasing intelligence about other possible attacks.
Information is very closely controlled in such circumstances, not least because there are major diplomatic and security sensitivities around RAF Fairford, which is the USA’s only European staging area for its heavy bomber fleet. The US Air Force has used Fairford to carry out bombing missions against Iran this year – but only after the then-prime minister Keir Starmer gave permission for it to use UK bases for “defensive purposes”.
Usually, in these situations, the US and UK governments would carefully coordinate to make sure their messaging was entirely in line in such situations.
And then, of course, there’s President Donald Trump, who rarely has time to bother with such details. Instead, he immediately sounded off to reporters, suggesting that the US had been involved with the operation, and giving details of its duration.
“We had them under investigation,” Trump said. “They were looking to do big damage to our fort and working with the British worked out great…we had them under view for a long time.”
Trump was evidently pleased with the UK, praising the “fantastic” arrests and the “amazing job” the police had done – but his delight was not enough to keep him on script. UK authorities had not disclosed anything about the possible intentions of the suspects, nor about the duration of the operation, or even whether or not they believed the airbase was definitely an intended target.
It is hardly out of character for Trump to run roughshod over such national security concerns, though: over his two terms, he has built up a consistent pattern of being utterly unable to keep his mouth shut when a chance to show off – or to make a threat – presents itself.
On more than one occasion, Trump has disclosed – either to the media or to foreign leaders – roughly where US nuclear submarines are operating. Once, he told his ally, the then-Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte, that the US had two nuclear submarines near North Korea, while last summer he disclosed he had repositioned two subs after threats from the former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev.
Trump has tweeted sensitive satellite intelligence about a failed Iranian satellite launch. He shared sensitive intelligence provided to him by Israel – on ISIS movements – with Russia. He took boxes and boxes of classified documents with him to Mar-a-Lago after his first term ended.
Only last year, the heads of two Dutch intelligence agencies confirmed that they were now restricting intelligence-sharing with US counterparts, particularly the CIA and National Security Agency, as a result of political developments in Washington, citing the possible “politicisation of our intelligence and the violation of human rights”. They suggested that this applied especially to intelligence about Russia.
Most significantly to the UK, his first term administration leaked sensitive police investigation materials from the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing – which killed 22 people, as well as the assailant – while the inquiries were still ongoing.
Trump can no more be trusted to keep a secret – even when his own nation’s vital security interests are at stake – than he can be trusted to stay on autocue. The implications of this are stark: the US is a vital intelligence and national security partner to the UK, but we straightforwardly cannot trust that any information that reaches its President won’t get into the wrong hands.
Managing Trump in his second term, as his popularity declines, his power wanes, and relevance drains away from him almost on a daily basis, is a waiting game for most global politicians – he will be gone in less than two and a half years, they know. Until then, most are keeping their heads down and getting on with whatever business they can.
But security is different: when the UK is trying to deal with what could be complex national security problems, not being able to rely on the discretion of the US President is a major headache.
Trump’s indiscretion on this occasion will almost certainly prove to be harmless. Next time, we might not be so lucky.












