The Cabinet is split almost right down the middle over whether the UK should rejoin the EU, The i Paper can reveal.
And there are further divisions on the question of whether any move to rejoin should be underpinned with a referendum or not.
A narrow majority of Andy Burnham’s ministers back a return to the bloc, but they remain divided over whether a second referendum would be necessary, how quickly Britain should move towards membership and whether Labour risks reopening the toxic divisions of the Brexit years.
The actors tipped to become the next James Bond

The search for the next James Bond may finally be coming to a close, with a handful of actors reportedly preparing for a screen test this weekend.
Let’s take a look at who is tipped to play the next 007.
Secret agent screening in London


It is unclear who the other actors joining Turner and Lowden will be.
Lights, camera, action!
The tests are understood to include three elements: stunts, camera presence and dialogue.
Reports vary that between three and five actors are finalists for the role, which was left open by Daniel Craig after 2021’s . It has been more than 20 years since the last full screen test for Bond, before Craig first stepped into the role in 2006’s Casino Royale.


- Speculation over the new Bond has intensified since film-maker Denis Villeneuve was revealed as director in 2025.
- The film is still reportedly positioned for a 2028 release.
- It will be the first Bond from Amazon MGM Studios, which bought the franchise rights as part of an $8.45bn (£6.9bn) deal in 2022.
Fans to wait a little longer
We’re excited to share more news with 007 fans as soon as the time is right.
Amazon MGM Studios paid more than $1bn last year to wrest “creative control” from the Broccoli family, who remain co-owners of the franchise.

The studio neither confirmed nor denied reports of a London screening, and said: “We don’t plan to comment on specific details during the casting process.”
Russia wages ‘grey-zone’ war
Running directly into Cornwall’s picturesque coastline, these cables are on the front line to protect Britain’s communications infrastructure, and any breakages – or destruction – risk crippling key services like hospitals, banks and mobile telecoms.
These cables are resilient, but fears of sabotage have heightened as Russia wages its “grey-zone” war against Britain.

Fishing trawlers sent to spy on cables
The Royal Navy’s chief, General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, warned earlier this year that Russia could attack the UK’s underwater cables during day one of any conflict with Nato.


This week, reported that Russia has been deploying fishing trawlers to spy on key sea cables around the British Isles.
Russia eyes UK coastlines
They will definitely be interested in the cables landing in Cornwall or Suffolk.
Beyond cables, Russia is probably also looking to exploit “weak spots much further ashore,” said Katja Bego, author of Deep Connections: The Hidden Battles to Control Subsea Cables.

The biggest threat of sabotage may lie at remote spots along Britain’s coastline.
The seaside spots ‘especially vulnerable’ to sabotage
A parliamentary report published last September warned that the landing stations where the cables reach shore may be “the most vulnerable part of the system”.
While military cables are secret, civilian cables and the landing stations housing them are not concealed.
- In its September report, the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy said security risks were intensified by the fact that many landing stations house multiple cables, with the sleepy Cornish town of Bude housing nine alone.
- Lowestoft in Suffolk is also an area of concern, with five cables running into it, according to the report.
- Blackpool in Lancashire, Highbridge in Somerset and the coastal stretch near Ramsgate and Broadstairs in Kent also host multiple cables.
Scientists discover real dawn behind Van Gogh’s Starry Night

Researchers believe they might have pinpointed the exact night sky depicted in Vincent van Gogh’s painting .
The revelation is challenging the dating of the artwork, long considered one of the world’s most famous.
What you need to know
In a study published in the journal , researchers said the celestial bodies depicted match the sky the Dutch artist may have seen on about 22 July 1889.

![Van Gogh: Poets and Lovers National Gallery, London 14 September 2024 ? 19 January 2025 Self-Portrait Vincent Van Gogh 1889 Oil on canvas, 57.8 ? 44.5 cm National Gallery of Art, Collection Mr. and Mrs. John Hay Whitney, 1998.74.5 ? Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington Image from https://press.nationalgallery.org.uk/archive/ Terms and Conditions: Terms and Conditions: Background The Board of Trustees of the National Gallery (?National Gallery?, ?we? or ?us?) have a number of digital files which are made available to you by the National Gallery Press Office on the terms set out in this agreement (each an ?Image?, together the ?Images?). Each Image: is either owned by us or by a third party (the ?Owner?); and relates to a temporary exhibition at the National Gallery (an ?Exhibition?). Licence We hereby grant you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable licence to use and reproduce each Image worldwide solely for press and publicity purposes for the duration set out in paragraph 4 in the form described in paragraph 5 (the ?Licence?). You may only use an Image prior to and during the period that the Exhibition it relates to is open to the public (the ?Licence Period?). You must not use or retain an Image after the Exhibition it relates to has closed to the public, and any such use or retention is at your own risk. For example, if the Gallery uploads an Image for an Exhibition on 1 January 2023 and the Exhibition is open to the public until 30 June 2023, you may use that Image from 1 January 2023 and up to and including 30 June 2023, after which your Licence to use that Image expires and you must not use the Image. If you are unsure about the dates of the Licence Period, please contact the National Gallery Press Office. We may provide a number of different Images of identical subject matter, each with different image resolutions. You may only use the Images as follows: Images containing ?X[number]? and ?-print? in their file name must only be used in print format (albeit not for print cover use, for which written consent from the National Gallery Press Office is required); Images containing ?X[number]? and ?-online? in their file name must only be used for online articles or blog posts (but not on social media platforms); Images containing ?X[number]? and ?-socialmedia? in their file name must only be used on social media platforms (such as Instagram, Facebook and Twitter). If there is no Image containing ?-socialmedia? in its file name made available to you, you must not use Images for this purpose; and Images containing ?NG[number]? in their file name can be used in print format, for online articles or blog posts and on social media platforms. You must, as a condition of the Licence: obtain (at your own expense) all permits and consents necessary for the use of the Image (for example, relating to artist?s copyright); only make use of the Image for the purposes outlined in this agreement and not for any commercial purpose; only use the Image during the Licence Period; ensure that any reproduction of an Image is a true reproduction and you must not crop, edit, manipulate, adapt or alter the Image without our prior written consent; ensure that each reproduction of the Image contains the following credits: (i) the artist; (ii) the title; (iii) any copyright notice or text provided by a third party under paragraph 6(a); and (iv) the copyright notice that we supply to you, such credit to be placed as close as possible to the parameters of the Image; not grant any sub-licences under this agreement without our prior written consent; not exercise the Licence in any way that is or renders the Image obscene, indecent, defamatory or in breach of the privacy or any other rights of a third party or of any law anywhere in the world, or disparages, disrespects or brings into disrepute us, the Owner or any artwork contained in the Image; not amend, adapt, use or position the Image in a way that is contrary to our values or so as to suggest that you, us, the Owner or any person appearing in the Image endorses any commercial product or service, any political party, belief or cause; permanently destroy or delete from your computer all copies of the Image by the expiry of the Licence Period and provide us with evidence of such deletion on request; and comply with all applicable law whilst exercising your rights and obligations under this agreement. You must immediately notify us in writing if any of the following matters come to your attention: any actual, suspected or threatened infringement of copyright in an Image; and any claim made or threatened that an Image infringes the rights of any third party. Copyright and Publication Rights Either we or the Owner owns the copyright in the Images. No ownership rights in any Image are transferred to you under this agreement. You shall assign and hereby assign any publication rights that may exist or which arise through your use of the Images. Indemnification You shall indemnify us and the Owner against all actions, proceeds, loss, costs claims or damages whatsoever incurred by or awarded against us and compensation agreed by us in consequence of your use of the Images and any breach by you of this agreement. Termination We may terminate this agreement immediately at any time by giving written notice to you (which may be by email, and shall be deemed to be received on sending). On termination or expiry of this agreement, all rights granted under this agreement shall immediately cease and you must cease to use, and delete any copies you hold of, the Images. Limitation of Liability Except for any liability which cannot be excluded or limited by law: we shall not be liable to you for indirect, incidental, special or consequential loss arising out of, or relating to this agreement or the use of the Images; and we shall have no liability to you under or in connection with this agreement. General Nothing in this agreement constitutes a partnership, agency relationship or joint venture between the parties. We reserve the right to make changes to this agreement from time to time, without giving notice to you. We shall be entitled to assign or licence all of the rights granted to us under this agreement to any third party. You shall not be entitled to assign or sub-licence your rights under this agreement without our prior written consent. If you sub-licence your rights under this agreement, you must procure that the sub-licensee complies with the terms of this agreement. If any provision of this agreement is or becomes invalid, illegal or unenforceable, it shall be deemed deleted but that shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the rest of this agreement. Except in relation to the Owner, no person other than a party to this agreement shall have any rights to enforce any term of this agreement (whether under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 or otherwise). This agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between you and us relating to the subject matter of the same and supersedes any prior agreement or understanding between you and us relating to the same subject matter as this agreement. You acknowledge that you have not entered into this agreement in reliance on, and shall have no remedies in respect of, any representation or warranty that is not expressly set out in this agreement (other than in respect of any fraudulent misrepresentation). Any failure by us or an Owner to exercise or enforce any rights under this agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any such rights, nor will that failure operate so as to bar the exercise or enforcement of those rights at any future time. Law and Jurisdiction This agreement and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with it shall be governed by the laws of England, and you and we agree that the courts of England shall have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute or claim.](https://inews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/SEI_220371219.jpg?w=640&h=711&crop=1)
That is about a month later than the usual date given for the work. At that time, Van Gogh was living at an asylum in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, where he had admitted himself after a series of mental health crises.
Hyades star cluster clue
- The June date rests on a letter Van Gogh wrote to his brother on about 18 June, describing “a new study of a starry sky” and on a mental breakdown in July, thought to have left him unable to paint for weeks.
- Moving the date to July means the moon, Venus and a star cluster called the Hyades that are shown could have been seen by Van Gogh from his window at the asylum.
A real or imagined sky?
We had to measure the degree of resemblance between the star patterns in the painting and the real sky.
The team used astronomy software to recreate the dawn sky for every day in June and July 1889. Only three dates qualified, and 22 July was the closest match.

A terror investigation is under way after one person was killed and four others injured in a drive-by shooting in a Paris suburb.

What do we know so far?
- Gunshots were fired at three separate locations in the Yvelines district and a suspect was arrested near the town of Trappes.
- The motive is currently unclear but the anti-terrorism prosecutor’s office said it was investigating.
- Mayor of Trappes Ali Rabeh said a man had fired shots from his car and “appeared to be firing at random and seemed intent on carrying out a massacre”.
- Rabeh said a 12-year-old girl was also among the injured, but this has not been confirmed by police.
The story so far in pictures



Attacker wielded ‘military-grade or automatic weapon’, says minister
The attacker used a “military-grade weapon, or at least an automatic weapon”, interior minister Laurent Nuñez said.
He later added the shooting was “clearly a terrorist crime”, however, an investigation into the motives is still ongoing.
President Emmanuel Macron expressed his “deep shock” in a post on X, and said his thoughts were with the victims.
Five key takeaways from the Mercury Prize 2026

Raye has won the 2026 Mercury Prize for her second album This Music May Contain Hope, featuring the global hit song “Where Is My Husband?”
The pop record, on which Hanz Zimmer was a collaborator, beat the likes of Sir Paul McCartney, Olivia Dean and Ex-Little Mix star Jade to scoop the £25,000 prize.
First pop album to win
It is the first pop record to win the prize – which has recognised the best British or Irish album of the last 12 months since 1994.
Speaking to the BBC afterwards, Raye said she’d “poured everything I had” into the record – which was delayed by almost a year after all of her songwriting books and demos were stolen.


Straying from the norm

- Of the last 35 winners, 20 have been debut albums – from artists including Arctic Monkeys, Suede and Franz Ferdinand.
- Many people have mistakenly assumed the Mercury Price is dedicated to first albums – but this year’s shortlist included only two: Dove Ellis’s , and Jade’s .
Rewarding the gritty long-form
Across 17 tracks and 73 minutes, Raye’s record tells a cinematic story about the end of a relationship where she emerges stronger and more resilient.


This year’s awards appeared to celebrate that gritty, long-form format over bubbly singles or TikTok-trending tracks.
Florence + The Machine now joint highest nominee with no wins
Florence + The Machine are now the Mercury’s joint highest nominee without winning, tying with Radiohead on five unconverted nominations.
Paul McCartney also missed out, alongside Britpop band Suede, rapper Dave, Knats, and debut star Dove Ellis.

Crystal Palace urged to retire bald eagle mascot – what we know

An animal rights group is urging Crystal Palace to retire their live bald eagle mascot with immediate effect.
The group, Peta, has argued that a “bright stadium filled with boisterous fans is no place for animals”.
What you need to know
- Peta asked the Premier League club to stop using the eagle, named Phoenix, in pre-match displays at Selhurst Park and to never use live animal mascots again.
- The London team, known as the Eagles since 1973, introduced a live eagle to matchdays in 2010.
- Kayla, who died in 2020, performed the role for 10 years and her replacement, Phoenix, made her debut against West Ham in 2024.
The impact on birds
- Peta says birds can become “frightened, disoriented and panicked” in stadium environments, putting themselves and fans at risk.
- Using them for entertainment means the animals cannot engage with their natural instincts, leading to “stress”, Peta added.

The organisation has “detailed records” of incidents involving live mascots being injured in these kinds of environments.

The UK is braced for “damaging” winds and heavy downpours with two named storms expected to wreak disruption on Friday and over the weekend.
Storm Austen, the first named storm of the season, could bring gusts of up to 80mph to parts of south-west England, with 60-70mph winds expected widely in the region.
Where will be worst-hit?
The Met Office has issued an amber warning for wind, covering , and the Isles of Scilly, coming into effect from 1am and remaining in place until 10am.
- Strong winds will be combined with spells of heavy rain, though gusts will gradually ease over Friday.
- The forecaster said Storm Austen is “likely to bring some disruption and possible damaging winds” and warned of disruption on the roads.
- Flying debris is “likely”, and the storm will “probably” bring some damage to buildings.
- In coastal areas, large waves could pose a danger to life.
The story so far in pictures



The impact of the storm

Power cuts have affected more than 9,000 homes in Cornwall and Devon.

Flights to and from Exeter airport have been cancelled.

Great Western Railway (GWR) has imposed speed limits on routes between Devon and Cornwall.

Network Rail Scotland also said its trains will also be slowed down in areas with heavy rain.

The expert view
This is the first stormy weather in the south of the UK this season and we expect some disruption as it moves through. With trees in leaf, it is likely fallen branches and trees could obstruct roads and railways so take extra care on the Friday morning commute.
Neil Armstrong, Chief met office forecaster

Europe’s record-breaking summer killed 50,000 people

More than 50,000 people are estimated to have died across Europe as a result of this summer’s record-breaking heatwaves, according to a new study.
Researchers estimate there were 4,354 excess deaths in the UK alone this summer.
Excess deaths have doubled
The number of excess deaths across Europe doubled in 2026, in comparison with last year – far surpassing the previous record of 29,000 deaths.
This was recorded in 2022 when the continent again endured exceptionally high temperatures, and the UK experienced 40°C for the first time.

Death toll may be higher in reality
30°C
According to the Met Office, the UK saw its hottest ever summer this year with five widespread heatwaves, and 40 days where the temperature was above 30°C.
Mainland Europe experienced its third hottest summer.
40%
Researchers looked at 854 urban areas in 30 European countries.
Because the study only looked at urban areas –roughly 40 per cent of each country’s population– researchers believe the death toll could be an underestimate.
Countries hardest hit by heat
According to the study, published in , southern and western Europe were hardest hit.
There were an estimated 22,000 deaths among those aged 85 and over. However, researchers noted that an estimated 6,000 people under the age of 65 are also likely to have died as a result of heat.
Around a third of the deaths took place in late June – before people had a chance to acclimatise to the weather, and when average temperatures across Europe were more than 5°C above normal levels.
- Italy experienced the highest number of excess deaths (13,303)
- Followed by France (7,268)
- And then the UK (4,354)
The expert view
It is yet another reminder both of the imperative of rolling out targeted interventions to protect those who are most vulnerable to this increasingly extreme heat, and of the growing need to rapidly transition away from fossil fuels.
Dr Clair Barnes, extreme weather and climate change researcher at Imperial College

It comes as the Prime Minister is hoping to sign a Brexit-reset deal next month which will open the door for under-30s to work and study in Europe, and make trade with the EU easier.
Burnham is expected to use this forthcoming UK-EU summit in Brussels on 20 November as a springboard for a wider national debate about Britain’s place in Europe, with rejoining on the table, along with membership of the customs union or single market.
The Prime Minister is gambling that a majority of voters now want much closer ties with Europe, and hopes this could provide a long-term answer to persistent cost-of-living problems and even the small boats crisis, which has been blamed on Brexit.
But with Nigel Farage’s Reform UK still an electoral threat despite slipping in the polls, particularly in Labour’s northern heartlands, many in his cabinet disagree with his strategy.
Around 15 of 28 ministers attending Cabinet are understood to support a return to the bloc, against 13 who are either undecided or opposed, according to people familiar with their views.
To hold a referendum or not to hold a referendum?
The Prime Minister has already set out a range of options for Britain’s future relationship with the bloc. These include a customs union, a return to the single market or even full EU membership.
One source familiar with the discussions said he was likely to set out a road map in a series of speeches on his 10-year plan for the country.
But beyond the question of whether to rejoin or not, there is the issue of whether rejoining should merely be part of the general election manifesto. But most ministers are understood to be coming round to the view that a second referendum is unavoidable.
Without a referendum there would be nothing to stop a future Conservative or Reform UK government from reversing the decision, the argument goes. That uncertainty would leave the EU distrustful of the longevity of any new arrangement.
“The EU needs to know this is what Britain really wants,” one source said.
Burnham has said a new referendum would not be the right move “right now”, but has stopped short of ruling one out in a future Labour manifesto.
Asked by the BBC last month whether such a commitment was possible, he replied: “Yes, things are possible. I think where we are isn’t good enough.”
Some would prefer Labour’s 2029 manifesto to seek a mandate to open negotiations on joining, with a commitment to walk away if the eventual deal was not good enough. Any agreement could then be put to Parliament for approval, The i Paper understands.
Others fear that a fresh campaign to rejoin would reopen old wounds.
One former Cabinet minister who regards themselves as pro-European said: “I won’t be involved in that. Seems like a recipe for division and self-flagellation to me. Have they looked at what’s happening in French and German politics? I think there’s a big difference between pragmatically getting closer, which I support, and rejoining.”
Those in favour of rejoining
Among those understood to be most supportive of rejoining are Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, Defence Secretary Wes Streeting, Welsh Secretary Stephen Kinnock, Labour Party chair Bridget Phillipson and Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh, who previously sat on the board of the pro-EU campaign group Best for Britain.
One Cabinet minister said: “I’m very pro-European. I think it will have to be step by step, with the summit being an important move towards where we will be. I imagine it will go beyond the next General Election, but I do believe we will be back in the EU in the next decade or so. I don’t think it will be fast, unless something seriously changes. It will take time.”
Some in the pro-European camp prefer to talk about joining rather than rejoining, The i Paper understands, arguing that the EU today is very different from the one Britain left.
They want the argument to be fought on the Leave campaign’s own ground: control.
Leaving the EU was meant to give Britain greater control over its borders, laws and economy. Yet, supporters of a closer relationship argue, immigration and small-boat crossings have increased, the EU continues to shape the terms of much of Britain’s trade in goods with Europe, and 16,000 businesses have stopped exporting to the bloc altogether.
Streeting has been among Labour’s most outspoken figures on Brexit, describing Britain’s decision to leave the EU as a “catastrophic mistake” and arguing that the country should ultimately seek to rejoin.
Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, who campaigned for Remain, is also supportive but has been more guarded in her comments in public.
Speaking at a fringe event at last month’s conference, she said Labour must “respect the red lines that were set out in the manifesto” for the rest of this Parliament. She added that “no one wants to go back to the toxicity and the divisions of previous Brexit debates”.
Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, is also understood to favour a closer relationship.
Those around him say his conversations with businesses have left him in “no doubt” about the negative impact of the Brexit deal.
Angela Rayner, the Housing Secretary and former deputy prime minister, is understood to be “really supportive” of what Burnham has said and “open-minded on future policy”.
But she believes any new manifesto commitment would require a fresh mandate from voters at a general election.
A Europe-sceptic Cabinet
Despite the growing support for a closer relationship, one Labour insider argued that Burnham’s Cabinet was “significantly more anti-Europe than the previous one”.
The source pointed to the departure of figures including Hilary Benn, Rachel Reeves, David Lammy, Peter Kyle, Nick Thomas-Symonds and Darren Jones, arguing that they were likely to support rejoining the EU, joining the single market or pursuing similar arrangements.
The source contrasted them with replacement figures including Chancellor John Healey, First Secretary Louise Haigh, Chief Whip Annalise Midgley and Education Secretary Lucy Powell, suggesting that the new Cabinet was more sceptical about Europe.
“Healey is an Atlanticist, he doesn’t like Europe,” the source said.
Among those thought to be less enthusiastic about returning to the bloc is Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, who told ITV News in May that reopening the debate over Britain’s future relationship with the EU was “a world away from what people are asking for”.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has also urged caution about reopening the debate. Speaking at a fringe event at the Labour Party conference, she argued that people needed to be more “clear-eyed” about the trade-offs and consequences of both positions.
Yvette Cooper, who campaigned for Remain, is also understood to be cautious about the prospect of Britain returning to the EU. Some have attributed her position to the views of voters in her constituency of Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley, in West Yorkshire, which was estimated to have voted 69.3 per cent to 30.7 per cent in favour of Leave in the 2016 referendum. Reform came second with as strong showing in the 2024 general election.
First, the Brexit reset summit
Burnham is expected to hold off on any decision until after the Brussels summit on 20 November.
The meeting is expected to focus on strengthening UK-EU cooperation, with leaders reviewing progress on defence and security, energy, agrifood rules, climate and migration. A joint declaration is expected at the end.
A successful summit could give the PM greater scope to open up the broader debate about Britain’s long-term relationship with Europe.
A longstanding pro-EU Labour source said: “He [Burnham] will follow up next month with a speech setting out our available options – all premised on what will work best for the British people. He needs to be given the space to lead that argument, and to make his case to the country.”
Even Labour’s most committed pro-Europeans are urging caution. Their concern is that committing to rejoin before the trade-offs have been properly debated could see the party lose the argument over Europe for a second time.
“Whatever is put to the people needs to be a fully fleshed-out deal,” said one activist. “We cannot have another situation where we are asking people to vote for an ill-defined concept rather than a concrete proposal.”
There are also questions about how realistic some in Government are prepared to be about the options available.
One source familiar with the discussions said there was still a considerable degree of “cakeism” – the belief that Britain can secure the economic benefits of closer ties with the EU without accepting the obligations or compromises that come with them.
For Burnham, the challenge is therefore not simply to persuade his Cabinet that Britain needs a closer relationship with Europe. It is to establish what that relationship would look like, what it would cost and what the country would be asked to accept in return.

















